Legal Opinion
Clausell v. Hobart Corporation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 12, 1987No. 86-924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
506 So.2d 1160 (1987)
Alberto CLAUSELL and Patricia Clausell, Appellants,
v.
HOBART CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 86-924.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 12, 1987.
Spence, Payne, Masington, Grossman & Needle, Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin and Joel S. Perwin, Miami, for appellants.
Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and James E. Tribble and Angela L. DerOvanesian, Miami, for appellee.
Before DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
Affirmed on the authority of Shaw v. General Motors Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We certify the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Shaw v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Holland v. MayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Biggs, Et Ux. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Clausell v. Hobart Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. DiazDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- NAT. INS. UNDERWRITERS v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- National Insurance Underwriters v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Wade v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987