Legal Opinion
Clausell v. Hobart Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 3, 1987No. 70566PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
515 So.2d 1275 (1987)
Alberto CLAUSELL, et al., Petitioners,
v.
HOBART CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. 70566.
Supreme Court of Florida.
December 3, 1987.
Joel S. Perwin of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., and Spence, Payne, Masington, Grossman & Needle, P.A., Miami, for petitioners.
James E. Tribble and Anthony D. Dwyer of Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl, Miami, for respondent.
GRIMES, Justice.
We review Clausell v. Hobart Corp., 506 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), to answer three certified questions of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The certified…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Melendez v. Dreis and Krump Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. BusterSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FleischerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Campus Communications, Inc. v. EarnhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Notami Hosp. of Florida, Inc. v. BowenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.