Legal Opinion

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 29, 1985No. 66198PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

476 So.2d 657 (1985)

Richard PULLUM, Petitioner,

v.

CINCINNATI, INC., the Cincinnati Shaper Company, Sti-Gro Corp., f/k/a Harry P. Leu Machinery Corp., Dissolved Florida Corporation, Robert H. Stine, Eugenie E. Stine and Robert E. Groth, As Directors and/or Trustees of Sti-Gro First Corp., Respondents.

No. 66198.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 29, 1985.

Rehearing Denied November 4, 1985.

Wayne Hogan of Brown, Terrell, Hogan & Ellis, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Michael J. Arington of Ellis E. Neder, Jr., P.A., Jacksonville, for respondents.

Cathy Jackson Burris, Ft. Lauderdale, for Academy of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. SirmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Bauld v. JA Jones Const. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. Matthews v. Lawnlite CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Diamond v. ER Squibb and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kush v. LloydSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Hanson v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Yao-Wen Chang v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API