Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Haynes

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.

This is an action of ejectment in which the plaintiff deraigns a title by a grant from the Pueblo of San Francisco and sundry mesne conveyances to one Sarah Boston, and by a deed from her and her husband, dated June 3d, 1854, to David Calderwood, and by sundry mesne conveyances from Calderwood to the plaintiff.

The defendants claim title under a deed from said Sarah Boston and her husband to one Wenborn, of a date prior to them deed to Calderwood. The deed to Wenborn is claimed to have been executed by one Strathern, under a power of attorney from Sarah…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Danforth v. DanforthIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. McCreery v. EverdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API