Legal Opinion

J. Bacon & Sons v. Martin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1939No. 203PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sought judgment declaring invalid a statute imposing a tax on “the receipt of cosmetics in the State by any Kentucky retailer,” 1 as applied to articles purchased from manufacturers and dealers in other States and transported to plaintiff at its place of business in Kentucky. Plaintiff contended that the tax was on “the act of receiving” and hence was a direct burden upon interstate commerce. The Court of Appeals of Kentucky thus construed the statute:

“The word ‘receipt’ is not used in a limited sense, but in the sense that it has already been received by the retailer and is now in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Monamotor Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Edelman v. Boeing Air Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Consolidation Coal Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. J. Elroy McCaw and John D. Keating v. Earl W. Fase, the Tax Commissioner of the Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Porto Rico Telephone Co. v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
  4. Stewarts' Pharmacies, Ltd. v. FaseHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Lohman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API