G.A. Modefine S.A. v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL
MOTLEY, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
I. Background
This ease arises under the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. (1994), and the New York common law doctrine of unfair competition. Plaintiffs are several corporations associated with designer Giorgio Armani. Plaintiffs have placed Defendants in three categories: (1) the retailer defendants; (2) the broker/distributor defendants; and (3) the manufacturer defendants. In essence, Plaintiffs claim that Defendants have engaged in the manufacturing, importation, distribution, offering…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Thomas M. Germain, Trustee for the Estate of O'sullivan's Fuel Oil Co., Inc. v. The Connecticut National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Protexol Corp. v. Koppers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Emmpresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Daisy Group, Ltd. v. Newport News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Ideal World Marketing, Inc. v. Duracell, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Tiffany & Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Gucci America, Inc. v. AccentsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.