Legal Opinion

Hansuld v. Lariat Diesel Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2003No. 02-258PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[11] Appellants William S. Hansuld and Tia J. Hansuld own property adjoining that of Appellant Lariat Diesel Corporation. Shortly after Hansulds purchased their property, they denied access to Lariat and erected a fence to prevent use. Hansulds filed a quiet title and declaratory judgment suit, and Lariat counterclaimed to establish its rights. Following a bench trial, the district court ruled that Lariat had an implied easement for access. Hansulds appeal that ruling.

[12] We affirm.

ISSUES

[13] Hansulds provide this statement of the issues:

1. Did the LLC have an interest in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rennard v. VollmarWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gray v. Norwest Bank Wyoming, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Corbett v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Beaudoin v. KibbieWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Estate of ShirranWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wallop Canyon Ranch, LLC v. GoodwynWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Miner v. Jesse & Grace, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Belden v. ThorkildsenWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Jacoby v. JacobyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API