Belden v. Thorkildsen
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[11] Margot Belden and Fish Creek Design, LLC, appeal a judgment entered in favor of John Thorkildsen. They claim that the district court erred when it concluded that Mr. Thorkildsen was not liable to Ms. Belden, or the LLC, for debt incurred when he purchased his interest in the business. Because we find that the district court's decision was premised upon an improper application of the parol evidence rule, we reverse and remand.
ISSUE
[T2] Although several issues were raised by the parties, we find one issue dispositive:
Did the district court err by refusing to consider…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Harber v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Piroschak v. WhelanWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kinstler v. RTB SOUTH GREELEY, LTD. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Thorkildsen v. BeldenWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Hofstad v. ChristieWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Thorkildsen v. BeldenWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- R.C.R., Inc. v. DelineWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.