Legal Opinion

Burchett v. Rx Optical

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1999No. Docket 196681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*176Murphy, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the order granting in part and denying in part defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We affirm.

This case arises out of Lisa Burchett’s termination of employment as an optician with defendant. However, this appeal only addresses the claims involving plaintiff’s son, Jacob. Lisa began working at Rx Optical in 1992. In December 1994, she became pregnant and informed her supervisor. On January 1, 1995, Lisa received a paycheck from which defendant had deducted money pursuant to its policy that its opticians would be responsible for mistakes made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Chandler v. Dowell Schlumberger Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dolan v. Continental Airlines/Continental ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Chmielewski v. Xermac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carranza v. United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Safiedine v. City of FerndaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API