Chandler v. Dowell Schlumberger Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
We granted leave in this case to decide whether the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act 1 shields an employee who was discharged under the erroneous perception that he reported a violation of law. We conclude that the statute does not protect such an employee.
i
Defendant Dowell Schlumberger Incorporated (DSl) hired the plaintiff on June 4, 1989, as a field engineer trainee. It promoted him to field engineer on November 11, 1990.
On April 6, 1992, the Michigan Department of Transportation, acting on a tip, cited DSl for carrying hydrochloric acid in a trailer not properly certified to carry it. Over…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Dudewicz v. Norris Schmid, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Dolan v. Continental Airlines/Continental ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Groncki v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Eric Kuhn v. Washtenaw CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Lee v. MacOmb County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.