Legal Opinion

Safiedine v. City of Ferndale

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2008No. Docket 272518PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

Plaintiffs, JSC Corporation, MTK Family Investment, and MTK Family Investment, LLC (collectively, the corporate plaintiffs), appeal by leave granted the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to defendant, city of Ferndale. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

This appeal by the corporate plaintiffs raises an issue of first impression under Michigan’s primary civil rights law: Do the antidiscrimination provisions of the Civil Rights Act (CRA), MCL 37.2101 et seq., protect only natural persons, and not juridical persons such as corporations? In other words, do…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Town v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gladych v. New Family Homes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Proudfoot v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Safiedine v. City of FerndaleMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API