Legal Opinion

Woodward v. McAdam

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1894No. 19257PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Paterson, J.—

This is an action on a negotiable promissory note secured by a mortgage given by the defendant McAdam to Shoobert, Beale & Co., and by the latter assigned to this plaintiff. The court below granted a decree of foreclosure as prayed for, and from such decree the defendant Jackson, who is a grantee for value by deed from McAdam given subsequent to the mortgage, has appealed.

The point made is that the mortgagee is a fictitious person—that the mortgage having been made to a partnership doing business under a fictitious name, creates at most only an equity, and as against a subsequent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tidd v. RinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Morse v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  3. Winter v. StockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Menage v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. County of Brown v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Treasure Valley Bank v. ButcherIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Shirran v. DallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. In Re George & John HurtDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  5. Tutt v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API