Woodward v. McAdam
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Paterson, J.—
This is an action on a negotiable promissory note secured by a mortgage given by the defendant McAdam to Shoobert, Beale & Co., and by the latter assigned to this plaintiff. The court below granted a decree of foreclosure as prayed for, and from such decree the defendant Jackson, who is a grantee for value by deed from McAdam given subsequent to the mortgage, has appealed.
The point made is that the mortgagee is a fictitious person—that the mortgage having been made to a partnership doing business under a fictitious name, creates at most only an equity, and as against a subsequent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tidd v. RinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Morse v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Winter v. StockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Menage v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- County of Brown v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Treasure Valley Bank v. ButcherIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Shirran v. DallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- In Re George & John HurtDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Tutt v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.