Legal Opinion
Cinco v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
Motion ‘ ‘ for an order striking out the Answer of the defendant, on the ground that it is sham and frivolous and for summary judgment, pursuant to Section 3212 CPLR for the relief requested in the Complaint ’
Plaintiffs own a parcel of land in the Arverne I Urban Renewal Area in the Borough of Queens. On April 20,1967, the Board of Estimate approved the Arverne Urban Renewal Plan and the acquisition of property in the urban renewal area “ by negotiation (and if necessary by condemnation) ”. Thereafter, on February 14, 1968, the Mayor approved the action of the Board of Estimate and directed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- City or Mount Vernon v. East Hudson Parkway AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. George Irish Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Freeman v. Paterson Redevelop. AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Kohl Industrial Park Co. (A Partnership) v. The County of RocklandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Kohl Industrial Park Co. (A Partnership) v. The County of RocklandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.