Legal Opinion

Bass v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 27, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-195866; No. 5093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This tort ease involves the placement of Otis and Diane Bass’s minor children by the South Carolina Department of Social Services (DSS) after the children became ill. The Basses alleged DSS failed to conduct a thorough investigation before deciding to remove the children from their custody. DSS admitted the investigation was not thorough, but argued its involvement with the family showed at least slight care. In a general verdict, the jury found for the Basses on both their gross negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress causes of action. DSS appeals the denial of its motion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. In Re the Care & Treatment of McCrackenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Jinks Ex Rel. Estate of Jinks v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bass v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. Bass v. SCDSSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API