Legal Opinion
State v. Paradis
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 26, 1983No. 82-057PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue in this criminal case is whether the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the defendant, who pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, is still suffering “from mental disease and that it would be dangerous for him to go at large.” See Laws 1977, 180:1 (current version at RSA 651:11-a (Supp. 1982)).
On December 12, 1979, the defendant entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity to two charges of recklessly causing serious bodily injury to another in violation of RSA 631:2. After a hearing pursuant to RSA 651:9-a (Supp. 1981), the Superior Court (Mullavey, J.) found…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roy v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- State v. RulloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PutnokiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. BertrandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. BallouSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. MercierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- In re BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.