Legal Opinion

State v. Mercier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 9, 1986No. 84-343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

The Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) committed the defendant to New Hampshire Hospital under RSA 651:9 (current version at RSA 651:9-a (Supp. 1985)), on the ground that it would be dangerous for him to “go at large.” In this appeal, the defendant raises four claims of error: (1) that the court ordered his post-trial psychiatric evaluation without legal authority; (2) that the order violated his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, as guaranteed by the State and National Constitutions; (3) that the procedure followed and the standards employed in determining his dangerousness denied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Novosel v. HelgemoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BriandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. In re SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. State v. FicheraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. In re FasiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. State v. McCartySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API