State v. Mercier
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
The Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) committed the defendant to New Hampshire Hospital under RSA 651:9 (current version at RSA 651:9-a (Supp. 1985)), on the ground that it would be dangerous for him to “go at large.” In this appeal, the defendant raises four claims of error: (1) that the court ordered his post-trial psychiatric evaluation without legal authority; (2) that the order violated his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, as guaranteed by the State and National Constitutions; (3) that the procedure followed and the standards employed in determining his dangerousness denied…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Novosel v. HelgemoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BriandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- In re SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. FicheraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- In re FasiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. McCartySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006