Legal Opinion
Barr v. Pontiac City Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1979No. Docket 78-381PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBashara, J.
Defendant Pontiac City Commission appeals from an order of the trial court directing them to recommend approval to defendant Michigan Liquor Control Commission of plaintiffs request to transfer a class "C” and an S.D.M. license to him. The order also provided that the city recommend delayed renewal of the licenses for the 1973 through 1978 licensing years. The licenses were to be held in escrow pending possible sale by the plaintiff.
Plaintiff or his family had operated a bar business at the same location in the City of Pontiac since 1930. In 1961, plaintiff sold the business, which included…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wojcik v. City of RomulusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Royal Oak Entertainment, LLC. v. City of Royal OakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Matter of Ratcliff Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Bunn v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Royal Oak Entertainment, L.L.C. v. City of Royal OakDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.