Legal Opinion
Royal Oak Entertainment, L.L.C. v. City of Royal Oak
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 21, 2007No. Civil 04-72728PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Defendants 1 have filed a motion to recover attorneys’ fees and costs from Plaintiffs Royal Oak Entertainment, LLC, Murray Hodgson, Royal Oak Theatre, LLC, and Peter Hendrickson, as well as their attorney Ms. Cindy Rhodes Victor. I previously granted summary judgment on all federal claims to the Defendants, see 2005 WL 2038586 (E.D.Mich. Apr. 14, 2005), and was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit. 205 Fed.Appx. 389 (6th Cir.2006). I hereby GRANT IN PART Defendants’ motion, and find Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re RubenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fharmacy Records v. NassarDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Royal Oak Entertainment, LLC v. City of Royal OakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Fharmacy Records v. NassarDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010