Legal Opinion

State v. Jakoski

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2003No. 29494PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We hold that the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider the motion made almost six year’s after the judgment was entered.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 31, 1994, Benjamin Jakoski was charged by information with the crime of sexual abuse of a minor. After plea negotiations, Jakoski, his counsel, and the prosecuting attorney appeared in court on October 25, 1994, in order for Jakoski to enter an Alford 1 plea to a lesser charge of assault with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Boughton v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Dionne v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ClementsIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. LuteIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. Michelle Faye McIntoshIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. Leotis B. Branigh, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API