Janice H. v. 696 North Robertson, LLC
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOGUE, J. *
INTRODUCTION
Doing business as Here Lounge, defendant 696 North Robertson, LLC, owns and operates a successful West Hollywood bar and dance club. It appeals from a judgment based on the jury’s award of $5.42 million in compensatory damages to plaintiff Janice H. (Plaintifl) for failing to use reasonable care to protect her from a sexual assault in a unisex bathroom stall. Here Lounge asserts it did not owe or breach a duty to Plaintiff and did not cause Plaintiffs injury. Here Lounge argues that the court abused its discretion by erroneously admitting irrelevant and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Anderson v. BabbeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Christina N. v. City of San Bernardino and Sonny AguileraDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Gordon v. ARC Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.