Legal Opinion
Shalz v. Union School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 1943No. Civ. 6768PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
The plaintiff was a building contractor duly licensed by the State of California, and doing business under the fictitious name of Shalz Construction Company. The defendants were and are a school district and the members of its board of trustees.
On December 9, 1939, plaintiff and defendant district entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to recon struct for defendant a public school building approximately nine miles from the city of Redding, at a place more commonly known as Boomtown.
The contract, among other things, provided that the work would be done in accordance with plans and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. WhitsettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Schumann v. California Cotton Credit Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- McIntosh v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.