Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Union Local 662
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 13, 2004No. 03-3699PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
In 2003, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) concluded that the General Teamsters Union Local 662 (“the Union”) had violated Section 8(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to execute a contract it had negotiated with W.S. Darley & Company (“the Company”). The NLRB then applied to this Court for enforcement of its order. For the reasons stated herein, we grant enforcement of the NLRB’s order.
I. Background
The Union is the exclusive bargaining representative for all of the employees at the Company’s Chippewa Falls manufacturing facility. In May 2000,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pattern Makers' League v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- E.B. Harper & Company, Incorporated v. Nortek, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burkart Foam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- The Lincoln Park Zoological Society v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mickey's Linen and Towel Supply, Inc., D/B/A Domestic Linen and UniformCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Active Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- NLRB v. Mickey's Linen & TowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006