Legal Opinion

Active Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 15, 2004No. Nos. 03-1374, 03-1433Published

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

The petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board was considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34®. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the cross-application for enforcement be granted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. StrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ark Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Capitol-Husting Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 728, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API