Legal Opinion
Cencula v. Keller
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 7, 1989No. 2-88-0569PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash
Defendant, Jay Keller (the owner), appeals from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, Arthur Cencula (the contractor), for $93,559 as damages for breach of a construction contract between these parties. The jury also found for the contractor on the owner’s counterclaim for damages from the contractor for his alleged failure to timely complete the project and do so in a workmanlike manner.
The owner appeals, contending that the contractor was not entitled to recover as damages for breach of contract the $20,790 in interest the contractor paid on funds he borrowed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Midland Hotel Corp. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Watson Lumber Co. v. GuennewigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Mohr v. Dix Mutual County Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Naiditch v. Shaf Home Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Case Prestressing Corp v. Chicago College of Osteopathic MedicineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ampat/midwest, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Cross-Appellant, and Triangle Fastener Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- M X L Industries, Inc. v. MulderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- A. Kush & Associates, Limited, an Illinois Corporation v. American States Insurance Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 900 v. SUBURBAN BUS DIV. OF REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITYAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- T.C.T. Building Partnership v. Tandy Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.