Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bank of Pleasant Grove v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1976No. 14404Published

1DissentMaughan, Justice

Defendants make three assignments of error. (1) Denial of their motion to quash a writ of replevin, on the ground the affidavit did not meet the requirements of Rule 64B,1 thus rendering it technically and legally insufficient. (2) Denial of procedural due process, because they were deprived of this property without prior notice or hearing. (3) Dismissal of their counterclaim.

The three assignments are well taken. We should reverse, and remand for further proceedings to determine defendants’ damages. Costs should be awarded to defendants. References to rules are to U.R.C.P.

Plaintiff, Bank of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Finkenberg Furniture Corp. v. VasquezCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  4. H. L. Griffin Co. v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Salisbury v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API