Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Hopman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeal, 16PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiff was a licensed broker working out of defendant’s real estate office. The premises at 218 West Walnut Lane in Philadelphia was listed with the defendant, by the owner, for sale at $28,000. Plaintiff found a buyer at that price and the sale was consummated. Plaintiff contended that his agreement was that he was to receive one-half of the usual commission of 5% for his services and on defendant’s refusal to pay, brought this action to collect $700. On the trial of the case defendant testified that the owner was his brother-in-law and that for that reason he had made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Narciso v. Mauch Chunk TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Kelly v. Scranton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Schroth v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Monier v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Hoagland v. MulfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Kraus v. Taylor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API