Bloom v. Hopman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
Plaintiff was a licensed broker working out of defendant’s real estate office. The premises at 218 West Walnut Lane in Philadelphia was listed with the defendant, by the owner, for sale at $28,000. Plaintiff found a buyer at that price and the sale was consummated. Plaintiff contended that his agreement was that he was to receive one-half of the usual commission of 5% for his services and on defendant’s refusal to pay, brought this action to collect $700. On the trial of the case defendant testified that the owner was his brother-in-law and that for that reason he had made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Narciso v. Mauch Chunk TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Kelly v. Scranton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Schroth v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Monier v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Hoagland v. MulfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Kraus v. Taylor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1997