Legal Opinion

Goldblum v. University Of Cincinnati

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 28, 2022No. 1:19-cv-00398Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI ANDREA GOLDBLUM, : Case No. 1:19-cv-398 Plaintiff, | Judge Matthew W. McFarland □ UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This case is before the Court on Defendant University of Cincinnati’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 65). The plaintiff, Andrea Goldblum, was formerly employed by the University as a Title IX coordinator. The only surviving claim is for retaliation under Title IX,

20 U.S.C. § 1681

et seq. The facts backgrounding this case…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Jackson v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API