Legal Opinion

Bringman v. Von Glahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, August Bringman and another, as administrators, etc., of Frederick Ments, deceased, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the defendant, entered in said court on the 3d day of May, 1901, upon the decision of the court dismissing the. complaint upon the merits.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

This action is upon a promissory note made by the defendant in favor of the intestate of the plaintiffs. The defendant admitted the making and delivery of the note, the non-payment thereof and the status of the plaintiffs. He denied that the note was given for value or that the intestate ever gave any consideration therefor. His counterclaim was withdrawn because the subject thereof had been embodied in a claim filed against the estate. The plaintiffs read the note in evidence and rested, and thereupon the defendants offered certain testimony. The learned court gave judgment for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hegeman v. . MoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Durland v. . DurlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bank of Gresham v. WalchOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. First State Bank v. RadkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. James Conforti Construction Co v. Neek Realty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
  5. Kemppainen v. Suomi Temperance SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API