Legal Opinion
United States v. Darlene Mathis-Gardner
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 21, 2015No. 14-3031PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS.
WILKINS, Circuit Judge:
The question before the Court is whether and to what extent a district court must explain its decision to deny a motion to terminate supervised release. We conclude that while a district court is required to consider certain factors before granting or denying a motion to terminate supervised release, there is no requirement that the district court explain its decision to deny such a motion so long as the court’s reasoning is discernible from the record. In the present case, however, we cannot discern the District…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections Mabel A. King v. James F. Palmer, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- United States v. George Lloyd PregentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Charles E. Wagner, for Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Timothy Jeffries v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army CorpsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- United States v. William Elijah TrailerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Anthony Tyrone JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.