Legal Opinion

Webster v. Goolsby

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 2, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Miller Circuit Court; George R. Hay-nie, Judge; 1. There was no evidence upon which to base instruction No. 2, for plaintiff, submitting the question as to whether or not “plaintiff drew upon defendant for an amount not exceeding what was due him” upon the first three cars which were shipped.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Miller Circuit Court; George R. Hay-nie, Judge; 1. There was no evidence upon which to base instruction No. 2, for plaintiff, submitting the question as to whether or not “plaintiff drew upon defendant for an amount not exceeding what was due him” upon the first three cars which were shipped. This issue should not have been submitted for the further reason that the contract, as shown by the agreement and stipulation of counsel, expressly provided that invoices and bills of lading should be mailed to "Webster, and Goolsby had no right to make drafts under his contract. Goolsby…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This suit was commenced by appellee in the court of a justice of the peace to recover a balance alleged to be due upon three cars of lumber shipped to appellant by appellee. The contract of sale was evidenced by a writing, the material portions of which are as follows :

“Potts Camp, Miss., Aug. 12,1913.
“To John M. Goolsby, Myrtle, Miss.:
“Fifty M. Ft. ash lumber at prices named F. O. B 15c rate to Evansville, Ind., for immediate shipment. (Dimensions described.)
“Mr. Goolsby agrees to ship this stock and guarantee the inspection. National lumber rules to govern the inspection. In case of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BarlowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ratton v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  2. Higgins v. GuerinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Haney v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Central Bank v. DowntainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Henry Quellmalz Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. BrineySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API