Anderson v. Distler
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
In this action the parties stipulated to waive trial by jury and also stipulated that the provisions of sections 439 and 440 of the Civil Practice Act, with respect to findings of fact and conclusions of law, be waived and that the court may render such decision as may be warranted by the facts without regard to said provisions.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover compensation for bringing to defendants a business opportunity which he contends proved profitable to them. This business opportunity plaintiff testified consisted of communicating to defendant John C. Distler an idea or plan,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Searles v. City of FloraIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Fox v. . Arctic Placer Mining Milling Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Warring v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Krisel v. DuranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Educational Sales Programs, Inc. v. Dreyfus Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Quadrille Business System v. Kentucky Cattlemen's Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.