Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Horwitz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1931No. 20409PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRilex, J.

This is a second appeal from an award of damages by a jury in a proceeding to condemn a triangular parcel of land in the southwest corner of lot 1, block 6, original town site of the city of Tulsa, to be used by the city as a part of an alley extending from the middle of the south line of said block, eastward to the southeast corner of the block, where it connects with Cincinnati avenue, running along the east side thereof.

The award in the first trial was $2,000, from which the city appealed, and judgment was reversed and remanded for a new trial, 131 Okla. 63, 267 P. 852. In the second trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Newton Appeal From Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Town of Chouteau v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Application of the City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Del City v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Enid Transfer & Storage Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API