In Re Forfeiture Hearing As To Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
837 F.2d 637
56 USLW 2411
In re FORFEITURE HEARING AS TO CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED, Claimant,
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED, Claimant-Appellee,
and
Christopher F. Reckmeyer, II; Robert Bruce Reckmeyer, Defendants,
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL);
National Legal Aid and Defender Association
(NLADA); and American Bar Association
(ABA); Amici Curiae.
No. 86-5050.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 6, 1987.
Decided Jan. 11, 1988.
Samuel Rosenthal, Chief, Appellate Section, Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice,…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Widener; Concurrence · Murnaghan; Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. KaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.