Legal Opinion

Cadel v. Sherburne Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 5, 1980No. 438-79PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse j udgment, after jury verdict in her action for injuries received while skiing. She claimed negligence and breach of warranty by the defendant in leasing and fitting to her boots, skis and release bindings, so-called, which failed to release when she fell. Causation of a knee injury appears to have been the principal issue at trial. The defendant contended her injuries resulted from her fall, an inherent risk of skiing rather than any defects in the bindings or their adjustment.

Plaintiff briefs three assignments of error, two relating to testimony by an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Monti v. Town of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  4. Baldwin v. GainesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. Morse v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. In Re Killington, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. State v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API