Legal Opinion

State v. Wilemon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1965No. A-10589PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This is an eminent domain proceeding in which the Court of Civil Appeals has held that a statement made by the trial judge during argument of counsel constituted a prejudicial comment on the weight of the evidence. The judgment of the County-Court at Law was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. 385 S.W.2d 573. We have concluded that the error asserted was not properly preserved in the trial court.

The proceeding was instituted by the State of Texas and County of Dallas, petitioners, to condemn an easement for highway purposes upon and across slightly less than one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wilemon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. JC Penney Company v. DuranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Pacesetter Corp. v. Barrickman, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
  5. Fenno v. Jacobe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API