Romez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted for attempt to commit the offense of burglary, his punishment being assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.
The record before us is without any bills of exception and the State has filed a motion to strike from the record the statement of facts because it consists entirely of questions and answers. A statement of facts in qupestion and answer form is not a statement of facts within Article 844c, C. C. P. and cannot be considered on appeal. King v. State, 82 Tex. Crim. Rep., 145; 198 S. W. Rep., 782; Kitchens v. State, 83 Texas…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Horace Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Emberline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Govance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Robertus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Montez, Del Real v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.