Legal Opinion

Romez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1922No. 7304PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for attempt to commit the offense of burglary, his punishment being assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record before us is without any bills of exception and the State has filed a motion to strike from the record the statement of facts because it consists entirely of questions and answers. A statement of facts in qupestion and answer form is not a statement of facts within Article 844c, C. C. P. and cannot be considered on appeal. King v. State, 82 Tex. Crim. Rep., 145; 198 S. W. Rep., 782; Kitchens v. State, 83 Texas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Horace Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Emberline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Govance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Robertus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Montez, Del Real v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API