Legal Opinion

Polk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1928No. 11476PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder, the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for fifteen years.. Two bills of exception are brought forward. Both are in question and answer form. No certificate of the judge showing the necessity of such form appears. Bills of exception in question and answer form are not entitled to consideration. Montez v. State, 276 S. W. 709; Robbins v. State, 272 S. W. 175; Romez v. State, 245 S. W. 914; Jetty v. State, 235 S. W. 589. Where a. bill of exception appears in question and answer form, in order to receive consideration, the certificate of the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jetty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Robbins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Romez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Montez, Del Real v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Lingo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API