Polk v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is murder, the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for fifteen years.. Two bills of exception are brought forward. Both are in question and answer form. No certificate of the judge showing the necessity of such form appears. Bills of exception in question and answer form are not entitled to consideration. Montez v. State, 276 S. W. 709; Robbins v. State, 272 S. W. 175; Romez v. State, 245 S. W. 914; Jetty v. State, 235 S. W. 589. Where a. bill of exception appears in question and answer form, in order to receive consideration, the certificate of the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jetty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Robbins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Romez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Montez, Del Real v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Lingo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.