Legal Opinion

Emberline v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1919No. 5330PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Palo Pinto County Court; W. F. Smith, Judge. J. R. Emberline was convicted of violating the tick eradication statute, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLattimobe, J.

In this case appellant was convicted in the county court of Palo Pinto county, Tex., of a violation of the tick eradication statute (Acts 35th Leg. c. 60), and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25, and he appeals.

[1] The Assistant Attorney General moves to strike out the statement of facts prepared by the stenographer, because the same is not incorporated in the transcript, and also because the same consists of questions and answers. The last objection is unquestionably good, and said motion is sustained. However, there appears in the transcript what purports to be a statement of facts in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API