Legal Opinion
In Re Weinstein
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1999No. 8-19-70940PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A COMPLAINT OBJECTING TO DISCHARGEABILITY
DOROTHY EISENBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
James Keen and United Metal Co. (the “Movants”) filed a motion seeking to extend their time to file a complaint objecting to the dischargeability of any debt owed to them by Howard I. Weinstein (the “Debtor”) pursuant to an arbitration hearing pending before the National Association of Securities Dealers regarding alleged securities fraud perpetrated by the Debtor. The Debtor objects, claiming that the motion filed by the Movants incorrectly refers to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Dolores Benedict, A/K/A Dolores Cogliano, Debtor. European American Bank v. Dolores Benedict, A/K/A Dolores CoglianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Robert Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz Wendell G. Freeland Richard F. KronzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Dombroff v. Greene (In Re Dombroff)District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Dollinger v. Poskanzer (In Re Poskanzer)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re NowinskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Hank Willms v. Rowe Sanderson, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- In Re ChatkhanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- In Re HigginsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re BallasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.