Legal Opinion

People v. Page

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1996PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

Under CPL 270.35, once the jury has commenced deliberations an alternate juror may riot be substituted for a regular juror unless the defendant consents to the replacement. The statute, moreover, specifies that such consent "must be in writing” and "signed by the defendant in person in open court in the presence of the court.” This case presents the question whether the defendant’s oral consent to the substitution is valid where there is no indication that the defendant signed a writing in open court memorializing that consent.

We conclude that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. People v. AhmedNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Stokes v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. People v. BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. GajadharNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. TrueluckNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API