Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2006PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

After a bench trial, defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree and burglary in the second degree. Initially, defendant claims that his waiver of a jury trial did not comport with constitutional and statutory requisites (see NY Const, art I, § 2; CPL 320.10 [2]). The record indicates that defendant executed a written waiver of a jury trial in open court which was approved by the trial judge. The circumstances surrounding the waiver, moreover, support the conclusion that it was knowing, intelligent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. DelamotaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. WitherspoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. BookerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. HaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API