Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 5, 1982No. CA 81-248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, was sued on a homeowners policy and the jury returned a verdict for the company. This appeal is from the granting of a motion for new trial. We find the motion should not have been granted.

Appellees’ motion was based on an allegation of juror misconduct consisting of a statement said to have been made by one of the jurors during jury deliberations. The motion was accompanied by the affidavit of a juror who also testified at the hearing on the motion. While it is not entirely clear from the appellant’s abstract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shipley v. Permanente Hospital (1954)California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Strahan v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Sanson v. PullumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Garner v. FinchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Estate of GriffithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Crawford v. Marshall Emergency Services Associates, PSCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  3. Campbell v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Campbell v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API