Garner v. Finch
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
This appeal results from the trial court’s granting appellees’ motion for a new trial following a jury verdict for appellant in the amount of $55,263.00 based upon his claim for personal injuries. Appellant challenges the correctness of that ruling. We affirm.
The trial court is vested with a wide latitude of discretion in acting on a motion for a mistrial or a new trial and will not be reversed on appeal absent a manifest abuse of discretion. General Motors Corp. et al v. Tate, 257 Ark. 347, 516 S.W. 2d 602 (1974); and Dickerson Construction Co. v. Dozier, 266 Ark. 345,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Dickerson Const. Co., Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- MacHost v. SimkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Martin v. BlackmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Roberts v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.