Legal Opinion

Garner v. Finch

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 1981No. 80-252PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This appeal results from the trial court’s granting appellees’ motion for a new trial following a jury verdict for appellant in the amount of $55,263.00 based upon his claim for personal injuries. Appellant challenges the correctness of that ruling. We affirm.

The trial court is vested with a wide latitude of discretion in acting on a motion for a mistrial or a new trial and will not be reversed on appeal absent a manifest abuse of discretion. General Motors Corp. et al v. Tate, 257 Ark. 347, 516 S.W. 2d 602 (1974); and Dickerson Construction Co. v. Dozier, 266 Ark. 345,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Dickerson Const. Co., Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. MacHost v. SimkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Martin v. BlackmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Roberts v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API