Legal Opinion

Keene v. Pacific Northwest Traction Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1929No. 21457. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant Keene was injured in a collision with the Seattle-Everett interurban train operated by the respondent, and brought this action to recover for the injuries suffered by him as a result thereof. There was a trial before a jury, at which the jury returned a verdict for the appellant. On motion of the respondent for a judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict, the trial court set the verdict aside and entered a judgment of dismissal.

As to the principal facts giving rise to the injury, there is no substantial dispute. At the place of the accident, the railway track of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mouso v. Bellingham & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Herrett v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Thornton v. HamiltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bowden v. Walla Walla Valley Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Golay v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Morley v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Hendrickson v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. McFadden v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API