Goldberg v. Bruschi
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to quiet title to mining land. The cause was tried by the court, and defendant had judgment, from which plaintiff appealed on bill of exceptions.
The findings are made up largely of probative rather than of ultimate facts. It was found: 1. That one Francisco Bruschi, on March 15, 1885, located a quartz-mining claim, the Quail Quartz Mine, six hundred feet wide and fifteen hundred feet long, in Mariposa 'County, particularly described in the findings; that by mesne conveyances afterward,—to wit, October 13, 1897,—the said mine became the property of defendant. 2. That…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Conner v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Quigley v. GillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Weed v. SnookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Tosco Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Crane v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Musser v. FittingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.