Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided October 26, 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Wayne Nichols State Representative 304 Poinsett Street Marked Tree, AR 72365-2237
Dear Representative Nichols:
I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on a number of questions that have been posed by the County Judge and several Mayors of Poinsett County concerning the Poinsett County District Court. The cities' questions are as follows:
1. With A.C.A. § 16-17-902 being amended by Act 72 [of 2005], can the district judge at his discretion travel to the five `departments' of Poinsett County District Court and hold court?
2. If the judge holds court in these five…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hilligoss v. LaDowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Cheqnet Systems, Inc. v. State Board of Collection AgenciesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Garian v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Frazier v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935