Legal Opinion

Doe v. McHenry

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 4, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0286Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-286-RCL JAMES R. MCHENRY, III, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants. ORDER I. Background The plaintiffs are three male-to-female transgender women in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) and housed in female penitentiary facilities. Compl. ¶¶ 3, 7, 10, ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs allege that they each suffer from gender dysphoria, a condition marked by significant distress and a host of physiological and psychological symptoms…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API