Shelby Casualty Insurance v. H.T., N.T., I.T. & J.T.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
LISA, J.A.D.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the inferred intent rule, which precludes, as a matter of law, insurance coverage for a sexual assault committed by an adult against a young child, applies when the sexual assault is committed by a minor under fourteen years of age. We hold that the per se rule does not apply and a factual determination must be made on a ease by case basis to determine the perpetrator’s subjective intent.
We granted Shelby Casualty Insurance Company (Shelby) leave to appeal from denial of its summary judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. BoylanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- State v. PreshaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GHWDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014