Legal Opinion

Mimsco Steel Corp. v. Holloway Concrete Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 1971No. [No. 372, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Himelfarb v. B & M Welding and Iron Works, Inc., 254 Md. 37 (1969), cited with approval in Palmer Park Limited Partnership v. Marvelite, Inc., 255 Md. 121 (1969), and U.S. Tile & Marble Co. v. B & M Welding and Iron Works, Inc., 254 Md. 81 (1969), is dispositive of the determinative issue here presented. Why it was not cited by the appellees or by the chancellor or mentioned by the appellant (Mimsco) we are not in a position to say. In question is the adequacy, Code (1968 Repl. Vol.), Art. 63, § 11 (a), of Mimsco’s notice of its intention to assert a mechanics’ lien. In pertinent part the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Noland Company, Inc. v. Allied Contractors, Incorporated, and Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  2. William Penn Supply Corp. v. WattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Himelfarb v. B & M Welding & Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. United States Tile & Marble Co. v. B & M Welding & Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Shryock v. HenselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Electrical Industry Fund v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Continental Steel Corp. v. SugarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. NATIONAL ELEC. INDUS. v. Beth. SteelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API