Legal Opinion

United States Tile & Marble Co. v. B & M Welding & Iron Works, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 3, 1969No. [No. 298, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.

This case involves another of the problems which haye risen in connection with the construction of Riverdale Plaza Shopping Center in Prince George’s County. See Himelfarb v. B & M Welding & Iron Works, Inc., 254 Md. 37, 253 A. 2d 842 (1969). For the purposes of this opinion, we shall adopt the agreed statement of facts contained in the appellant’s brief. 1

“Plaintiff-Appellant, United States Tile and Marble Company, Inc. [(U.S. Tile)] performed various work as a tile subcontractor pursuant to two contracts entered into with Cohen-Himelfarb Associates, general contractors, on a proposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. District Heights Apartments v. Noland Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Welch v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. Parker v. Tilghman v. Morgan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Bukowitz v. Maryland Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Wohlmuther v. Mt. Airy Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Himelfarb v. B & M Welding & Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Wolf Organization, Inc. v. OlesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Grinnell Co. v. City of CrisfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. National Electrical Industry Fund v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Continental Steel Corp. v. SugarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API